Aphex Channel Instruction Manual Page 26

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 32
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 25
230
instruction Manual
Aphex Systems Ltd. Model 230Page 24
230
master voice channel
Page 25Aphex Systems Ltd. Model 230
Appendix E: Back To BASS-ICS
by Marvin Caesar
Think of a sound system with incredible bass. Are you imagining
the sound of the bass or are you imagining how the bass would
feel? If you are imagining sound, then you are thinking too high
in frequency. The bass referred to in this article causes a visceral
response.
Ask any non-professional to listen to a sound system. Reduce the
bass, listen, then reduce the high frequencies, return the bass to
flat and listen again. The listener will probably decide that listening
to the system with attenuated highs is much preferable to listening
to the system with attenuated lows.
David J. Holman, a friend of ours and a recording engineer and
producer of several platinum albums had this to say about bass:
“Bass is the most important thing on a record. Without it you
don’t have a record. People think bass is just the bass instruments,
but it is also the “wood” in an acoustic guitar and the “chest” of
a male vocalist. With a good low end, a synthesizer sounds rich
and expensive. Without a good low end, it just sounds like more
digital nonsense.
Maintaining quality bass over a wide dynamic range is made
difficult by subjective human hearing response. As shown in the
constant-loudness curves published by Harvey Fletcher and Wilden
Munson, the threshold of hearing at the extreme low frequencies
requires approximately 60 dB higher sound level than the thresh-
old of hearing at 1kHz. The hearing curves gradually become fairly
flat at listening levels around 90dB-SPL, and remain so above that
level.
This explains the well-known phenomenon that occurs when play-
back level is reduced: the bass seems disappear.
Over the years, several methods have been used to overcome this
phenomenon. The most common method has been fixed equaliza-
tion. We’re all familiar (maybe too familiar) with the disco smile on
graphic equalizers: lowest and highest frequencies pushed up, the
midrange sagging. By adding a fixed amount of gain on the low
end, this method helps overcome the disappearing bass phenom-
enon. The problem caused by this added gain, however, may be
more serious than those solved.
The principle of superposition is that the motion of electrons in
a circuit, or of air around our ears, is single vector sum of all the
forces at work. Different electrons don’t alternate at different
frequencies; of the electrons in the circuit have the same instan-
taneous potential and direction. Figure 1 shows a high frequency
riding on a low frequency. Although frequency is not usually
shown this way, this is just the way the superposition works, in a
wire or at our eardrums.
Headroom is the range, in decibels, between present operating
levels and the crash point, those levels that would damage equip-
ment or distort signal. There is no such thing as infinite headroom,
electronic or acoustic. If the low frequencies are increased in level,
even though the boosted frequency band never reaches the crash
point, the higher frequency peaks are closer to or exceed the crash
point.
As the boosted frequency band gets lower in frequency, this phe-
nomenon gets more pronounced. Imagine adding a direct-current
offset into an amplifier, and how quickly this change would send
the signal into distortion. Subharmonic generators are sometimes
used for bass enhancement. These devices read signals in the
mid-bass frequency area and synthesize artificial signals an octave
below these signals. The use of subharmonic generators also
causes an increase in overload problems, with overloads taking
place at higher frequencies.
Many systems are biamplifted, triamplified or quad-amped. Such
systems might avoid the peak overload characteristics of wide-
band systems, but adding a fixed amount of low frequency gain
or increasing subharmonics can cause overload problems within
the bass band(s).
Let’s ignore overload problems for a moment and look at the sonic
effects of these methods. Adding bass boost through equalization
or subharmonics might be quite musical when the bass needs the
enhancement. These methods, however, have no way of determin-
ing when the bass does not need the enhancement and when it
does. If the bass content in the source material is sufficient, adding
fixed equalization or subharmonics would surely make the output
too bottom-heavy.
That brings us to yet another method of bass enhancement:
multiband gain control. The signal is divided into frequency bands,
and each band is separately processed through an automatic gain
control circuit, which narrows the dynamic range in the band.
Whether the outputs of the separate compressors are summed
again into a single band or sent directly to amplifiers, this method
helps keep the bass within a limited time dynamic range, increas-
ing level when the input is low and decreasing level when it is high.
The multiband feature reduces spectral intermodulation (one part
of the spectrum modulating another), which could be introduced
by a simple wide-band device.
Although this method maintains a limited dynamic range, by
definition it changes the dynamics of the signal. Thus the sound
of the output will depend upon compression ratios, attack and
release characteristics and threshold. Depending on how aggres-
sively the signal is being compressed, it may sound totally mashed.
Furthermore, if there is far greater gain reduction in one band than
in others, the total integrity of the entire mix may be thrown out
of balance.
A NEW SOLUTION
What to do? Enter Big Bottom (sideways, if it is a narrow door-
way).
Aphex’s Donn Werrbach, the inventor of the Compellor, the
Dominator, and several versions of the Aural Exciter, comes from a
broadcasting background. In that competitive industry, each sta-
tion tries to produce as attention-getting a sound as possible while
remaining within legal modulation limits. Given the constraint of
extremely limited headroom, Donn searched for a method that
would enhance the low frequencies musically and naturally but
without vastly increasing peak output. He found the answer in
time, literally and figuratively. He found that by making a copy of
incoming low frequency information, delaying it by a set amount,
and adding it back as a constant-level enhancement signal, he was
able to achieve a dramatic increase in the perception of the bass
without a corresponding increase in peak output.
Page view 25
1 2 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Comments to this Manuals

No comments